Comparison Chart
Primix Hybrid Cross Ties
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
| Estimated up to 60 year life span | None |
| Can last 300% longer than wood | |
| Structural inner core can be varied
for light and heavy axle loads |
|
| Less vibration produces a smooth ride
and less wear on equipment |
|
| Vibration-dampening qualities do not
disturb railway |
|
| Better locomotive fuel efficiency
due to improved gauge control |
Plastic Cross Ties
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
| Estimated up to 60 year life span | Difficulty holding gauge |
| Can twist and bend in hot weather | |
| Limited to using cut or screw spikes | |
| Length limitations |
Concrete Cross Ties
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
| Bear heavier axle loads | Average weight 700 to 850 pounds each |
| Firmer stability for high speed applications | Weight of crosstie crushes limestone bed
requiring more maintenance |
| Expensive to transport |
Steel Cross Ties
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
| Firmer stability for high speed applications | Cannot interchanges with other crosstie types |
| Accepts only steel fasteners |
Wood Cross Ties
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
| Easily manufactured | Rots and decays |
| Lower purchase price | Susceptible to insect infestation |
| Cracks and split easily | |
| Tendency to flex requiring more frequent
maintenance of beds |
|
| Limited weight bearing load | |
| More repair and maintenance required | |
| Difficult and costly disposal | |
| Use penetrating creosote treatment |